贾翊文, 荆文龙, 杨骥, 等, 2024. 基于深度学习的SAR影像海洋涡旋检测算法对比分析[J]. 海洋科学进展, 42(1): 137-148. doi: 10.12362/j.issn.1671-6647.20220907001.
引用本文: 贾翊文, 荆文龙, 杨骥, 等, 2024. 基于深度学习的SAR影像海洋涡旋检测算法对比分析[J]. 海洋科学进展, 42(1): 137-148. doi: 10.12362/j.issn.1671-6647.20220907001.
JIA Y W, JING W L, YANG J, et al, 2024. Comparative analysis of ocean eddy detection algorithms based on deep learning in SAR images[J]. Advances in Marine Science, 42(1): 137-148. DOI: 10.12362/j.issn.1671-6647.20220907001
Citation: JIA Y W, JING W L, YANG J, et al, 2024. Comparative analysis of ocean eddy detection algorithms based on deep learning in SAR images[J]. Advances in Marine Science, 42(1): 137-148. DOI: 10.12362/j.issn.1671-6647.20220907001

基于深度学习的SAR影像海洋涡旋检测算法对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Ocean Eddy Detection Algorithms Based on Deep Learning in SAR Images

  • 摘要: 为探究不同类型深度学习目标检测算法在亚中尺度和小尺度海洋涡旋检测中的性能,本文利用ERS-1/2、ENVISAT、Sentinel、GF-3和ALOS-2等卫星影像,构建了一个包含亚中尺度与小尺度海洋涡旋的SAR影像数据集,涵盖了多源、多尺度的海洋涡旋目标。基于构建的数据集,分别采用RetinaNet、Faster R-CNN和Cascade R-CNN三种深度学习目标检测网络进行实验,并对3种网络的检测速度、检测精度与抗背景干扰能力开展综合性对比分析。实验结果表明,检测速度方面,RetinaNet网络更快,每秒检测帧率为19.4;检测精度方面,Faster R-CNN精度为0.797 5,比RetinaNet和Cascade R-CNN更高;抗背景干扰方面,Cascade R-CNN的抗背景干扰能力更强,在涡旋目标分布密集且与背景区分度较低的情况下,能够正确检测出更多的涡旋。

     

    Abstract: In order to investigate the performance of different deep learning object detection algorithms in submesoscale and small-scale ocean eddy detection, this study constructs a SAR image dataset containing submesoscale and small-scale ocean eddies using satellite images such as ERS-1/2, ENVISAT, Sentinel, GF-3 and ALOS-2, which covers multi-source and multi-scale ocean eddy targets. Based on the constructed dataset, three object detection networks, RetinaNet, Faster R-CNN and Cascade R-CNN, are used to conduct experiments, and a comprehensive comparative analysis is conducted to evaluate the detection speed, accuracy and background clutter resistance of three networks. Experimental results indicate that RetinaNet is the fastest in terms of detection speed, achieving a frame rate of 19.4 frames per second. For detection accuracy, Faster R-CNN outperforms RetinaNet and Cascade R-CNN with an average precision of 0.797 5. When it comes to background clutter resistance, Cascade R-CNN demonstrates greater strength, excelling at detecting eddies in densely distributed and less distinguishable backgrounds.

     

/

返回文章
返回